Allowing consumers with a good faith
suspicion they are fraud victims to place an
initial fraud alert for (90 days). credit pacific service union
-
Permitting consumers who provide an official identity
theft report (either the FTC report or local police) to
place an extended fraud alert (up to 7 years). credit first service union
-
Requiring the CRA that received the alert to pass it on
to the other CRAs. card credit mobile service
-
Permitting those on active military duty to place
active duty alerts. card credit discover service
-
When a report contains an alert, requiring CRAs to
notify users of discrepancies in addresses. credit public service union
-
Prohibit sale or collection of debts resulting from
identity theft. card credit processing service
-
Preventing fraud-related data from
re-polluting a victim s credit report. center credit service union
171
California Civil Code Sections 1785.16(k) 172
California Civil Code Sections 1785.15.3 In addition, the 2003
Amendments required rule-making and studies in a host of areas
related to credit report accuracy, credit scoring and identity
theft by the FTC and the U.S. banking regulatory agencies. credit security service union
These are all welcome and constructive additions to the
FCRA. But upon their enactment, consumer advocates and privacy
experts were quick to point out that they still did not go far
enough. Worse, the federal law preempted state activity in too
many areas. credit report service
More work lies ahead. Consequently, the history of the FCRA,
or credit report inaccuracy, or identity theft, is far from
over. Continue to Next Chapter 2005
Evan Hendricks and Privacy Times, Inc. All rights
reserved. Enroll in Credit Repair About Veracity
Credit Consultants Contact Veracity Full Refund Policy Veracity
Site Map Privacy Statement Terms of Use blogspot com christian
Veracity - History and Overview of Credit Repair
solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. - H. L. Mencken If
you want to find an industry with a horrible reputation, you
need not look much further than credit repair. And for good
reason. In this chapter, we will recount major enforcement
actions against credit repair clinics. We will also touch on
problems in the credit counseling and debt consolidation
fields. But we will also hear from two small companies that say
they ethically help consumers correct errors or otherwise
improve their credit reports. christian counseling credit
Over the years a steady drumbeat of warnings about credit
repair scams have come from the Federal Trade Commission, state
Attorneys General, AARP, and Call For Action. Despite these
warnings, tens of thousands of consumers over the years,
probably desperate to improve their credit reports, have turned
to credit repair clinics. Consequently: credit federal service union
-
Credit repair clinics collectively are making millions
of dollar annually, typically charging consumers about
$300-$400 dollars per year. credit monitoring service
-
Investigations of and enforcement actions and lawsuits
continue against credit repair operators for ripping off
consumers. credit division service
-
Credit repair clinics continue advertising that they can
help remove negative information from your credit report
(regardless of its accuracy). card credit online service
Steve Baker, Director of the Federal Trade Commission in
Chicago and a leading enforcer of the credit repair law, said a
prevailing myth about credit repair is that there are loopholes
in the federal law that allow poor credit to be erased. It
doesn t exist. consumer counseling credit inc
The Credit Repair Organizations Act
Let s start with the law. Under the Credit Repair
Organizations Act (CROA)173, and similar state laws,
credit repair organizations must give you a copy of the
Consumer Credit File Rights Under State and Federal
Law before you sign a contract. A credit repair company
cannot: card credit fleet service
-
How long it will take to achieve the results consumer credit service
-
Any guarantees they offer, and center credit family service
-
The company s name and business address credit reporting service
Your contract must specify:
-
The payment terms for services, including their total
cost cca credit division service
-
A detailed description of the services to be
performed credit free report service
173
15 U.S.C. Sect. 1679(h)(b) 174 These
restrictions do not apply to a (1) non-profit organization; (2)
creditor restructuring a consumer s debt or (3) depository
institution. card credit customer discover
Bombardment Technicalities
A typical technique used by credit repair outfits (CROs) is
to flood consumer reporting agencies with letters disputing
negative items in the credit report. CROs emphasize that when
derogatory information is disputed, credit bureaus must remove
it if they are unable to verify it within 30 days. They argue
that with enough dispute letters, repeated over time, the
credit bureaus will give up. However, the Big Three credit
bureaus have ramped up their systems for countering this
approach. Not only do their automated systems dispose of
disputes with a few keystrokes, but also the bureaus often
disregard repetitive disputes as frivolous. Some
CROs are known to try and mask their involvement by mailing in
dispute letters from different locations around the
country. credit repair report service
Some CROs proclaim that they exploit technicalities to
remove negative data. For example, if the consumer owes $1,
000.09 debt, and the credit bureau reports it as a $1, 000.90
debt, some CROs argue that all references to the debt must be
deleted when disputed. The FTC views such claims as false. credit legal repair service
One case that illustrated the techniques and reach of credit
repair was that of National Credit Repair. On August 11, 2003,
the FTC announced that National Credit Repair, one of the
country s largest credit-repair operations, agreed to pay
more than $1.15 million in consumer redress to settle charges
that it violated the federal credit repair law. The FTC charged
that the six Michigan-based defendants falsely claimed that
they could remove derogatory information from consumers
credit reports, even if that information was accurate and not
obsolete. cic credit monitoring service
173
The defendants were ICR Services, Inc.; a Livonia,
Michigan-based company; and its three officers and directors,
Bernadino J. Pavone, Jr., his mother Gloria Tactac, and Abood
Samaan. The remaining defendants were National Credit Education
and Review (NCER), based in Canton, Michigan, and its president
Todd Renzi. ccs credit division service
The defendants purported to do this through the use of a
one-of-a-kind computer disk that they claimed could
search and identify errors in the process used by the credit
reporting agencies to enter negative items onto consumers
credit reports. credit service union worker
Since 1996, the defendants have sold their credit-repair
service to more than 183, 000 consumers, taking in more than
$53 million on those sales (about $290 per
consumer).176 The company sold its services through
a network of 50, 000 sales representatives, who were paid
commissions for each sale, the FTC said. 1st credit service union
Get A New Number
Another approach that has drawn enforcement action is known
as File Segregation, in which the credit repair
outfit shows the consumer how to obtain a new taxpayer
identification number (TIN) or employer identification number
(EIN) from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. The consumer is
then taught to create a new identity under the number on the
theory that it will create a whole new file at the credit
bureau and separate the individual from the negative credit
history under his true Social Security number. The first
problem with this approach is that it is a felony to put false
data on a credit application. Second, the credit bureaus
algorithms are designed to accommodate discrepancies in
identifiers, so that if the individual was still applying under
the same or similar name or address, the information could end
up in the same file anyway. card chase credit customer
176
FTC v ICR Services, Inc., et al.: U.S. Dist. Ct. - Northern
Dist. Of Illinois (Eastern Div.) - No 03C-5532; complaint at
http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/08/icrcmp.pdf In October 1999,
sixteen defendants agreed to settle FTC charges that their
file segregation schemes violated the CROA. The
settlements were the result of an FTC s sweep entitled,
New ID, Bad IDea. 177 Thirteen of the
sixteen defendants had to refund money to consumers. Three of
the defendants showed they lacked enough money to pay
refunds. card chase credit service
On May 9, 2001, Clifton W. Cross was sentenced to 49 months
in federal prison and ordered to pay nearly $171, 000 in
restitution as part of a guilty plea resolving criminal charges
stemming from a file segregation 178
scam. Cross and his company, Build-It-Fast,
promised consumers perfect credit... instantly. It
showed consumers how to get new Employment Identification
Numbers and then substitute them for SSNs when applying for
credit. Under a settlement with the FTC, Cross agreed to get
out of the file segregation business.179 citi credit monitoring service
On February 17, 2004, a federal grand jury in Los Angeles
returned a nine-count, criminal-contempt-of-court indictment
against Richard Murkey Sr., 57, for returning to the credit
repair business despite a previous court order that he stay out
of it.180 credit plus service union
177
The settlements of the Operation New ID - Bad
IDea sweep are with Mehmet Akca (FTC File No. X990018);
Frank Muniz (FTC File No. X990020); LSQ International (FTC File
No. X990024), Standard Business Services (FTC File No.
X990021); Pro Se Publications (FTC File No. X990023); Ross
Sanford Leiss (FTC File No. X990026); Michael Lyons (X990027);
Edward Lane (FTC File No. X990032); All About Communications
(FTC File No. X990030); Express Financial Planning (FTC File
No. X990034); Financial Publishers of America (FTC File No
X990033); New Start (FTC File No. X990028); Frederick P. Ray
(FTC File No. X990066); Internet Publications (FTC File No.
X990064); P.M.. Enterprises (FTC File No. X990047); Fresh Start
(FTC File No. X990044). credit farm service
178
FTC v. Clifton W. Cross, et al.: U.S. Dist. Ct. - Western
Dist. of Texas (Midland); No. M099-CA-018 179 FTC
News Release, June 21, 2001; ww.ftc.gov/opa/2001/06/cross.htm
180 News Release (No. 04-020), Debra W. Yang, U.S.
Attorney for Central Dist. of California,
www.usdoj.gov/usao/cac/pr2004/020.html The FTC brought a civil
case against Murkey in 1998 for misleading consumers in
connection with credit repair. In November 1999, a federal
court in Los Angeles found that Murkey systematically violated
the credit repair law and banned him from the business. The
2004 indictment charged that immediately following the
court s order, Murkey continued to offer credit repair
services through businesses such as Credit Restoration
Corporation of America, Inc. In 2001, the L.A. court held
Murkey in civil contempt, but he again returned to credit
repair, the indictment charged. 1st credit federal service
There is only so much that civil enforcement can do
against scams like credit repair, said Howard Beales,
then Director of the FTC s Bureau of Consumer Protection.
We appreciate the Justice Department s willingness to
pursue the criminal sanctions that con artists so richly
deserve. credit paychex service tax
To Boldly Go...
An even more exciting scheme allegedly was operated
by the husband-wife team that co-owned Second Chance Financial,
a credit repair outfit based in Riverside, Calif181.
According to an August 2004 federal grand jury indictment,
Mickey Lynn Manning and her husband, Ross Smith allegedly
recruited employees from the major credit bureaus
Equifax, Experian and TransUnion who would enter false
and misleading information into their databases with the
purpose of improving the credit scores of Second Chance
credit repair customers, stated a press release from Los
Angeles U.S. Attorney Debra W. Yang. credit service tax
Also indicted was Marcus Brandon Betts, of Ontario, Calif, a
former team leader of Trans Union s Dispute
Dept. in Fullerton, Calif., for falsifying credit report data
on behalf of paying customers who wanted to improve their
credit scores. aeon credit service
181
Remember, all those mentioned were only charged and had not
been convicted of anything. People are presumed innocent until
proven guilty. But the information is in the public domain and
the story is quite compelling. credit one service union
The 16-count indictment named Dolores Guerrero, a Customer
Service Representative on Experian s Dispute Team in the
Dallas facility, as an unindicted co-conspirator. Guerrero
pleaded guilty to fraud in May 2004 and is serving a prison
term of more than three years, officials said, adding that she
was paid $300-$500 a week in bribes. bad cell credit phone service
No Equifax employees were named in the press release or the
indictment, but a source said the husband-wife team had
recruited operatives at Equifax s dispute facility in
Jamaica. It was the first known case of credit bureau employees
being accused of illegally working on behalf of outsiders. counseling credit debt service
How They Did It
This investigation started in 2002 when, according to
sources, Experian noticed a pattern of suspicious activity,
specifically entries on credit histories that were made by one
employee. That employee was terminated. A joint review by the
credit bureaus prompted them to refer the matter to law
enforcement authorities. Second Chance Financial
helped their credit repair customers in two ways.
According to the indictment, in 2001, they would send to their
accomplices at the credit bureaus fictitious dispute
letters to justify deletion of negative data from their
customers credit histories. The credit bureau employees
would then delete negative items from client credit reports and
place the fictitious dispute letters in their credit
bureau s files. card credit payment service
Second, they worked with at least three other conspirators
who allegedly were employed at companies like J J
Financial Services, of Fort Lee, N.J. (Jose L. Crespo);
Diamond Star Financial, of Teaneck, N.J. (Jamila
Takiyah Davis); and Superior Financial of Valencia,
Calif. These firms allegedly became subscribers of the major
credit bureaus and then fraudulently reported positive loan
histories on the credit repair clients. This, combined with the
removal of negative data, had the effect of raising
clients credit scores. The indictment estimated $6 million
in losses to more than 50 businesses. At the time, lawyers
representing those who were indicted told reporters either that
their clients would plead not guilty or that they had no
comment. card credit merchant
182 Privacy Times
, Vol. 24 No. 16, Aug. 31, 2004 Where To Draw The
Line The Credit Repair Organization Act (CROA) is very
broad in prohibiting for-profit companies from accepting
advance payment for help in improving one s credit record,
or providing advice or assistance to that effect183.
But several consumers have alleged in separate federal lawsuits
that credit monitoring services are doing just that in
violation of CROA. One suit charged that ConsumerInfo.com, a
Web site where consumers paid a $79.95 annual subscription for
unlimited access to their Experian credit
reports184. The suit said that the company acted
like a credit repair outfit because it took money up front,
provided consumers with a Blueprint for Rebuilding Your
Credit, and offered a service that helped generate
dispute letters. Moreover, a Yahoo search using the term
credit repair consumerinfo turned up the
phrase, How Can I Repair My Credit Rating and a
link to the www.consumerinfo.com. The company strongly denied
it engaged in credit repair and defended itself in the lawsuit,
which was pending when this book went to print. counseling credit family
Similar suits are pending against Trilegiant Corp. s
PrivacyGuard. 183 While some legal
experts wonder whether such a broad prohibition on commercial
speech could withstand Constitutional scrutiny, no successful
challenge has yet been brought. 184 Ronald W.
Helms v. ConsumerInfo.com, Inc.: U.S. Dist. Ct. N. Dist of
Alabama (Middle Div.) - No. CV-03-RRA-1439-M The Modern
Landscape annual credit report request
As of January 2005, it appeared that a handful of companies
dominated the credit repair industry. One market leader was
Lexington Law Firm, based in Salt Lake City, Utah. According to
its Web site, Lexington began operating in 1991 and has served
over 100, 000 consumers. It claimed to have challenged
and deleted 350, 174 negative items on credit reports in
2003. (Lexington cannot delete items; presumably,
it meant that its disputes prompted the CRAs to delete the
negative items.) area bay credit service
Lexington required a $79 payment covering what it called a
case setup. New clients were required to sign a
retainer agreement. In accordance with federal
regulation, Lexington charges retroactively for the service it
performs, billing $39 for the dispute work performed in
the previous month, the firm stated on its Web site. (Remember,
the Credit Repair Act prohibits for-profit companies from
collecting fees in advance for disputing credit report
errors.) atlanta consumer counseling
Lexington s Web site said its system works in cycles.
Clients begin by sending in their three credit reports. The
firm enters the information in a database, and presents the
client with a list of disputable items. The client chooses
which items to dispute, and Lexington then sends dispute
letters to the CRAs. (Lexington considers these dispute letters
to be trade secrets and will not share them with anybody,
including the client.) account card credit merchant
When you receive a response from a bureau, make a copy
of the updated report for your records then send the original
to Lexington to move your case forward. Thus the cycle begins
anew, this time hopefully with fewer negative items on your
credit report, the Lexington Web site states, describing
the fourth step in the cycle. aspire card credit customer
185
www.lexingtonlaw.com The annual cost is $508 ($79.00
initial + 11 months $39.00/ea). After 12 months, clients are
entitled to a refund if Lexington does not effectuate deletion
of at least 11 negative items. It calculates that each deleted
item has a $50 value. So, if only two items are deleted, the
client is entitled to a $408 refund, according to the Web site.
The Lexington Web site sports both the Better Business Bureau
seal (BBB) and separate seal for BBB s Online Reliability
Program. Clicking on the first seal takes you to a BBB Web page
stating: card counseling credit service
Based on BBB files, this company has a satisfactory record
with the Bureau. Any complaints processed by the Bureau in its
three-year reporting period have been resolved. The number and
type of complaints are not unusual for a company in this
industry. card credit online processing
To have a Satisfactory Record with the Bureau, a
company must be in business for at least 12 months, properly
and promptly address matters referred to it by the Bureau, and
be free from an unusual volume or pattern of complaints and law
enforcement action involving its marketplace conduct. In
addition, the Bureau must have a clear understanding of the
company s business and no concerns about its industry. consolidated counseling credit
Other credit repair companies that take approaches similar
to Lexington at similar prices, and which feature a BBB seal,
include CreditAttorney, 186
Ovation Law, and Legacy Legal
Services. 187 A Google search, and the
accompanying ads, turned up a host of credit repair
clinics. check credit service
Not every consumer has been satisfied with Lexington
Law s services. In 2000, the Tennessee Office of Attorney
General investigated the firm for possible violations of the
telemarketing sales law. 186 www.creditattorney.com,
Dana Facemyer, Provo, Utah 187
www.legacylegalservices.com, Brian Rollins, Tempe, Arizona The
result was a consent agreement in which Lexington, while not
admitting any wrongdoing, agreed not to request
payment... to remove derogatory information from, or improve, a
person s credit history, credit record, or credit rating
before the expiration of the time frame in which [Lexington]
has represented all of the goods or services will be provided
to that person. 188 card credit online payment
A Different Approach
Stephen Gardner knows a lot about the credit reporting
system, and about credit repair outfits. As the Texas Assistant
Attorney General in the late 1980s and early 1990s, he led
investigations that resulted in landmark settlement agreements
with the Big Three consumer reporting agencies
(CRAs). Under those agreements, the CRAs vowed to take steps to
prevent mixed files, reinsertion of previously deleted data,
and to conduct adequate investigations upon receiving consumer
disputes (see Chapter 10). Those agreements served as the
foundation for the 1996 FCRA amendments. civil credit ontario service
Gardner, now an attorney in Dallas, Texas, said the only
organization he knows that ethically helps consumers is First
Stone Credit Counseling (FSCC), 189 and its
affiliate company, the People s Credit Bureau
(PCB).190 Based in Dallas, the two companies are run
by Bruce J. Danielson, a former pilot and military veteran.
Danielson said First Stone is the only Consumer Advocate Credit
Counseling organization in the country because it helps the
consumers organize their matters and clean up their credit
reports. antonio credit san security
188
State of Tennessee v. Lexington Law Firm: U.S. Dist. Ct. -
Middle Dist. Of Tennessee; Civil No. 3-96-0344; Agreed Final
Order, 9/29/00. 189 http://www.firststone.com/
190 http://www.peoplescreditbureau.com/; The Peoples
Credit Bureau sells annual memberships ($150 for singles, $200
for couples), offering fast-track credit
restoration, a newsletter, and other consumer education
material. card cardmember chase credit
On behalf of an estimated 300 clients each year, Danielson
engages in what he called accountability combat,
in which the average client s credit report is
cleaned up in four-to-seven months, and no one takes longer
than two years. Danielson pointed out that the FCRA not
only requires that credit reports be accurate, but that they
are relevant, confidential, and properly utilized
as well. clean credit repair service
Danielson said he leverages the consumer s willingness
to repay a loan so that the creditor reports information to the
credit bureau in a manner most beneficial to the consumer. As
an example, he cited the negative hit a credit report takes
when a consumer pays an old charge-off or collection because it
can re-freshen the
date-of-last-activity (DLA), making the negative
account more recent, and consequently, cause
greater damage to the credit score. credit management service
FSCC believes people need to pay their bills and
timely. Therefore, we fairly settle many situations.
However, we also get the proper paperwork in hand before
payment is delivered which protects our consumer clients from
further abuse and victimization, the company stated in a
fact sheet. colorado credit public service
Danielson, who hosts a weekly radio show called The
Consumer Fight Back Show, said that many of the people
in the credit counseling industry are collection agencies
in disguise. He said the most famous organizations, the
non-profit National Foundation For Consumer Credit (NFCC) and
Consumer Credit Counseling Services (CCCS), are actually a set
of non-profit franchises that earn billions of
dollars each year, primarily serving creditors
interests. consolidation counseling
The CCCS Web sites state that their average client
takes five years to complete their program, and worse yet,
there is no credit file clean-up. The bottom line is that you
may end up having seven to fifteen more years of credit
hell, he said. Danielson also warned of private
companies that offer credit counseling, referring to them as
NFCC clones. bureau card credit service
NFCC has a different view. On its Web site, it described how
its member organizations help millions of debt-laden consumers
at a low or reasonable price. It claimed to help some consumers
by giving them a Debt Management Plan (DMP). card credit customer service
Fair Isaac and Company (FICO), has publicly stated
that since 1999 FICO has completely ignored any credit report
mention of a Debt Management Plan arrangement with any
counseling agencies. This is great news for consumers and
credit counselors both. Therefore, credit counseling and DMP
services do not negatively affect credit scores. As to
consumers ability to obtain credit, it is the discretion
of individual creditors as to how they interpret a
consumer s credit report history and their decision to
extend credit, NFCC stated on its Web
site.191 credit financial service
monebaggasse
For example, Veracity has been repairing credit reports since 1998, free record with the BBB, and is actively involved in promoting and legitimizing the credit repair marketplace. Many thousands of clients have been fully satisfied with Veracity's credit repair services, and nearly all have seen improvements to their credit reports. Veracity' and the majority of new clients come to Veracity based on word of mouth referrals from satisfied clients.
Ambitious Indeed. But we know better credit makes for a better life. Our motto isn't something a marketing firm cooked up for us we've seen the benefits of our credit repair services time and again. A clean credit history and accurate credit report data means a better credit score, making life easier and more affordable. At Veracity, we welcome everyone who can benefit from our personal credit repair services.